Plant Communication and Neurobiology in Amazonian Shamanism

11 min read

This article is part of the Yaogará Ark, a living archive of Amazonian teacher plants and Indigenous knowledge systems.

Abstract

This article examines the ethnobotanical and anthropological dimensions of plant communication and neurobiology within Amazonian shamanic traditions, emphasizing teacher plants (plantas con madre) and their signaling mechanisms. Integrating Indigenous conceptions of plant agency with contemporary scientific research on plant signaling and neurobiology, the article highlights intersections and divergences between these knowledge systems. It clarifies how Amazonian healers understand plant communication as central to apprenticeship, healing, and cosmology, while reviewing research on plant signaling that may bridge scientific and traditional frameworks (Balick 2020; Trewavas 2003, ©Established scientific review). While scientific accounts typically avoid claims about plant consciousness, they do recognize sophisticated signaling, coordination, and responsiveness in plants—phenomena that resonate with Indigenous descriptions of teacher plants as intentional, communicative beings. The discussion is grounded in ethnographic accounts of apprenticeship and ceremonial practice, alongside current findings in plant electrophysiology, volatile signaling, and information processing.

Botanical Classification

Teacher plants occupy a functional category rather than a single taxonomic group. They are drawn from multiple botanical families and encompass diverse growth forms, from lianas to shrubs and trees (Schultes 1972; Schultes et al. 1974)[2][5]. This diversity reflects the plurality of roles these plants play in Amazonian medical, ritual, and cosmological life.

  • Exemplary species and lineages:
    • Banisteriopsis caapi (ayahuasca vine): a liana of the family Malpighiaceae, foundational to many Amazonian healing systems and ceremonial lineages.
    • Psychotria viridis: a shrub of the family Rubiaceae, commonly combined with the vine in ayahuasca brews.
    • Additional teacher plants—both psychoactive and non-psychoactive—are included in local pharmacopoeias and may be administered in isolation during dieta practice for apprenticeship and protection (Schultes 1978)[2].

Ethnobotanists such as Richard Evans Schultes have emphasized the importance of accurate taxonomic identification of teacher plants—an effort complicated by rich vernacular naming systems. Local names often encode distinctions in plant varieties, preparation styles, ecological origin, and subjective effects perceived during ritual use, reflecting sophisticated Indigenous taxonomies that coexist with Linnaean classification (Schultes 1978)[2].

Geographical Distribution and Habitat

Teacher plants are distributed broadly across the Amazon Basin, including lowland terra firme forests, floodplain (várzea) mosaics, and ecotonal regions where Andean foothills transition into Amazonian lowlands (Schultes 1972; Schultes et al. 1974)[2][5]. The cultural geographies of teacher plant use vary by language family, river system, and historical exchange networks, producing regionally distinct ceremonial complexes and plant repertoires.

As a cultivated and managed species, Banisteriopsis caapi occurs in homegardens, forest margins, and secondary growth, while also persisting in semi-wild states through vegetative propagation by practitioners. Psychotria viridis is often maintained near households or sacred groves for ready access to fresh leaves. In many communities, gardens, forest paths, and riparian zones also serve as learning environments where initiates attend to the sensory, seasonal, and ecological cues associated with each plant.

Such plant distributions are not purely ecological; they are also social and historical. Lineage-based transmission of cuttings, seeds, and preparation styles has co-evolved with human settlement patterns, interethnic exchange, and ritual itineraries. As ceremonial practices travel and hybridize—including in urban centers—teacher plant ecologies also shift, raising new questions about sourcing, cultivation, and long-term sustainability.

Ethnobotanical Context

Across Indigenous and mestizo traditions of the Amazon, teacher plants are regarded as sentient beings with the capacity to teach, guide, heal, and transmit knowledge (Luna 1984; Bussmann 2011)[1][6]. Apprenticeship proceeds through structured engagements known as dietas—periods of seclusion that entail dietary, social, and sexual abstinence, and close mentorship under experienced healers (curanderos, ayahuasqueros)[1]. Each plant is understood to possess a distinct personality, strength, and communicative mode; initiates learn to discern these qualities through repeated, disciplined contact (Luna 1984; Bussmann 2011)[1][6].

In this context, plant communication is a literal exchange of knowledge and relational attunement—experienced through visions, dreams, songs (icaros), synchronicities, and subtle shifts in attention and perception. Plants are also central to cosmology and identity formation within healer lineages, where mastery of plant relationships confers social authority and ethical responsibilities (Luna 1984)[1][3]. The concept of “madre” (mother) attributes tutelary presence to certain plants, framing them as teachers who both protect and discipline the apprentice over years of training (Bussmann 2011)[1][3].

Ethnographic accounts emphasize that plant agency is not metaphorical in these systems; it is a practical ontology. Healers describe dialogical relations with plants, cultivated through vows, songs, abstinences, and ritual commitments that make communication possible and safe. This body of practice is not static: it adapts to new social realities, from intercultural exchanges to the pressures of globalization and tourism, while retaining core ethical and cosmological principles (Luna 1984; Schultes 1978)[1][2].

Phytochemistry and Pharmacology

Pharmacology: Principal teacher plants contain active compounds that affect the human nervous system. In Banisteriopsis caapi, β-carboline alkaloids such as harmine and harmaline act as monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), enabling the oral psychoactivity of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) from companion plants like Psychotria viridis (Schultes 1972; Schultes et al. 1974)[2][5]. These β-carbolines also exhibit intrinsic psychoactive, neuromodulatory, and potentially neurogenic properties, contributing to the phenomenology of ayahuasca experiences and to therapeutic potentials under investigation in biomedical contexts.

Beyond psychoactive species, many teacher plants employed in dieta are not overtly visionary but are judged by healers to carry powerful teaching, protective, or diagnostic qualities. Their effects may include modulation of sleep, attention, somatic perception, or dream content—domains central to shamanic learning. While biomedical research has only begun to map these effects, practitioners relate their efficacy to each plant’s “virtue” and spirit, as learned experientially within lineages (Luna 1984; Bussmann 2011)[1][6].

Plant neurobiology and signaling: Emerging research investigates parallels between Indigenous accounts of “learning from plants” and the demonstrable capacities of plants to sense, signal, and coordinate responses. Plants engage in intricate signal transduction processes—including electrical signaling, calcium-based action potentials, hormone cascades, and release of volatile organic compounds—that enable networked information processing, resource allocation, and defense priming (Trewavas 2005, Calvo et al. 2020, [DOI:10.1101/2020.12.15.422882]). Plants also participate in inter-organismal communication via mycorrhizal networks and root exudates that modulate neighboring plant physiology and microbial communities. Integrative frameworks in plant neurobiology emphasize distributed, non-centralized processing in plant tissues and dynamic responsiveness to complex environments, without presupposing consciousness (Calvo et al. 2020).

Bridging frameworks: While Indigenous explanatory models treat communication with plants as a literal exchange of knowledge possible through altered states of consciousness, scientific research typically refrains from attributions of subjectivity. Nonetheless, the recognition that plants exhibit sophisticated signaling phenomena—electrical responses, hormonal cascades, mycorrhizal mediation, and chemical messages emitted under stress—creates a shared empirical ground for dialogue between ontologies (Trewavas 2005, Calvo et al. 2020, [DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.08.010]). The philosophical distinction remains: teacher plants are persons in Indigenous cosmologies, whereas in scientific frames they are organisms with complex signaling capacities. Yet convergences around sensitivity, memory-like priming, and adaptive coordination invite careful transdisciplinary inquiry (Luna 1984; Schultes 1978)[1][2].

Traditional Preparation and Use

Ceremonial protocols honor both biochemical efficacy and the integrity of spiritual relationships. The ayahuasca brew is most commonly prepared as a decoction of Banisteriopsis caapi vine with leaves of Psychotria viridis, providing a synergistic combination of β-carbolines and DMT that gives rise to visionary experience and deep introspection (Schultes 1972; Schultes et al. 1974)[2][5]. Preparation is ritualized, with attention to who may harvest, how materials are selected and cleaned, the timing and direction of stirring, the use of prayers or icaros, and the observance of fasting and isolation (Luna 1984)[1]. Many lineages maintain rules around salt, sugar, spices, and sexual abstinence to “cool” the body and heighten sensitivity to instruction.

Dietas represent a complementary and often long-term practice that immerses the initiate in direct relational apprenticeship with a selected plant. Administration extends beyond ingestion to include topical applications, vapor baths, and inhalations, shaped by lineage-specific knowledge and the perceived “temperament” of the plant. Practitioners describe the process as dialogical—an ongoing conversation mediated by dreams, songs, visions, and embodied signs that refine attention and intuition (Luna 1984)[1][6]. Early dietas focus on cleansing and protection; later stages introduce more powerful teacher plants and complex combinations, always under ethical constraints and reciprocal commitments to plant beings.

Transmission and continuity: Knowledge of teacher plants is sustained through oral tradition, apprenticeship, and ceremonial instruction, often involving secrecy, vows, and graded initiation (Luna 1984)[1][3]. Lineages regulate access to more potent plants and to “hot” techniques that can be dangerous if mishandled. Mastery entails not only pharmacological competence but relational ethics, including how to ask permission, how to offer, and when to refrain. Contemporary dynamics—global interest in ayahuasca, biomedical research, and commodification—have introduced both opportunities for cross-cultural dialogue and risks of dilution, appropriation, and harm. Indigenous organizations and collaborations with ethnobotanists have responded by developing documentation initiatives, educational programs, and community-led frameworks to strengthen intergenerational continuity (Plotkin & Hettler 2021)[4][3].

Communicative skills: Ethnographic fieldwork consistently notes that the ability to “listen to” or “see with” plants is considered a core skill of healers, cultivated through years of disciplined practice. This entails learning to read subtle cues in the sensory environment and one’s own bodymind, interpreting dreams and visionary content, and modulating ritual conditions to maintain safe channels of communication. Such skills are inseparable from broader Indigenous relational ontologies that situate humans within a multispecies social world, governed by obligations, kinship, and reciprocal care (Luna 1984; Schultes 1978)[1][2].

Conservation and Ethical Considerations

Teacher plants face overlapping ecological and social pressures, including habitat loss, overharvesting, and unsustainable commercial demand in the context of globalized ayahuasca tourism and therapeutic markets (Coe 2018)[3]. Conservation strategies increasingly adopt biocultural frameworks that honor the inseparability of plant populations from the communities and cosmologies that steward them. Key principles include:

  • Respect for Indigenous intellectual property, customary law, and collective rights over knowledge and genetic resources.
  • Participatory research and management models that place Indigenous organizations and healer lineages in leadership roles.
  • Protection of sacred sites, ceremonial landscapes, and culturally significant plant populations through community-led conservation and co-management agreements.
  • Ethical sourcing and cultivation standards for ceremonial centers and research programs, including transparent benefit-sharing mechanisms.
  • Responsible tourism guidelines that prioritize community consent, practitioner credentials, participant safety, and reinvestment in local stewardship.

Ethical questions are not peripheral to plant communication; they are constitutive. If teacher plants are persons and teachers in Indigenous frameworks, then research, commercialization, and clinical adaptation must be evaluated not only for efficacy but for relational integrity. This includes protecting ritual knowledge from misappropriation, preventing extractive data practices, and ensuring that benefits flow to the communities who sustain these traditions (Schultes 1994; Coe 2019; Balick 2020)[2][3].

Sustainability: The expanding global demand for ayahuasca and other teacher plants prompts practical measures: cultivating Banisteriopsis caapi and companion species in community nurseries and agroforestry systems; developing seed banks and living collections curated by Indigenous institutions; and supporting local monitoring of harvest practices, with adaptive management to avoid pressure on wild stands (Coe 2018)[3]. Biocultural indicators—ritual vitality, intergenerational training, language use, and continuity of plant lineages—are as critical as conventional ecological metrics for assessing the health of these systems.

Research ethics: Ethnobotanical research should recognize the dynamic, living nature of plant knowledge and actively involve knowledge holders in all stages of inquiry—from framing questions to interpreting findings and determining appropriate applications (McKenna Academy 2021)[3]. Cross-disciplinary projects linking plant neurobiology and Indigenous epistemologies benefit from slow, trust-based collaboration, robust consent processes, and explicit attention to the potential harms of category errors (e.g., reducing teacher plant agency to metaphor or, conversely, over-extending plant sentience claims without empirical warrant). Rigorous attention to both ontological difference and empirical common ground can advance respectful dialogue and mutually beneficial outcomes.

References

  1. Bussmann, R.W., et al. (2011). “Plantas Con Madre”: Plants That Teach and Guide in the Shamanic Initiation Process of Amazonian Societies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21295130/
  2. Sessa, B. (2020). The ‘enigma’ of Richard Schultes, Amazonian hallucinogenic plants and ritual. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0306312720920362
  3. McKenna Academy. (2021). People and Plants: Ethnobotany in the 21st Century. https://mckenna.academy/course/an-introduction-to-ethnobotany/
  4. Peabody Museum (2022). The Amazonian Travels of Richard Evans Schultes. https://peabody.harvard.edu/video-amazonian-travels-richard-evans-schultes
  5. EthnoPharm (2021). The Amazonian Plant Teacher. https://ethnopharm.com/the-amazonian-plant-teacher/
  6. Luna, L.E. (1984). The concept of plants as teachers among four mestizo shamans of Amazonian Peru. https://home.iscte-iul.pt/~fgvs/Luna_plants.pdf
  7. Calvo, P., Sahi, V.P. & Trewavas, A. (2020). Are Plants Sentient? Plant, Cell & Environment, 43(5), 1196–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13716
  8. Trewavas, A. (2005). Plant intelligence. Naturwissenschaften, 92(9), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-005-0014-9
  9. Coe, M.A. (2018). Sustainability of Ayahuasca Harvesting in the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.03.043
  10. Schultes, R.E., & Hofmann, A. (1992). Plants of the Gods: Their Sacred, Healing, and Hallucinogenic Powers. https://archive.org/details/plantsofthegods00schu

License

CC BY-SA 4.0 – Yaogará Ark — a living ethnobotanical research archive